Coptic AIPrototype

Vocabulary, Cuneiform Transcriptions of Prototypes of Autochthonous Coptic

By Werner Vycichl

Ask about this article

vocabulary, cuneiform transcriptions

of prototypes of autochthonous

coptic. Fully vocalized prototypes of Coptic words are found in cuneiform transcriptions. Thus, it is known that the month name B ,oiak (S koiahk and many variants) was pronounced in Late Egyptian *ku-i -ku or something close to it. These transcriptions are often preceded by determinatives, such as (ilu), god; (in), male person; ( lu), town; and (m tu), country.

Three periods have to be distinguished (all dates according to Beckerath, 1971):

1. Middle-Babylonian transcriptions: the so-called Tell el-Amarna Letters, which comprise the correspondence of Amenophis II (1439-1413 B.c.) and Amenophis IV (Akhenaton) (1365-1349 B.C.) with their allies and vassals in Asia, tablets found in the foreign-office archives at Tell el-Amarna (central Egypt), and letters and documents of the Hittite royal archives of Boghazkeui (Asia Minor) of the time of Ramses II (1290-1224 B.c.).

2. Assyrian transcriptions: inscriptions, annals, and commercial documents from the time of Sargon II (722-705 B.C.), who conquered Palestine and received tribute from Bukurninip (Bocchoris in Greek), king of Egypt in 714 B.C.; of Assarhaddon (conquest of Memphis, 671 B.C.), and of Assurbanipal (conquest of the Delta, 667 B.C.).

3. New-Babylonian and Persian transcriptions: mainly commercial documents of the time of Cambyses (525-522 B.C.), Darius I (521-486 B.c.), Artaxerxes I (464-424 B.C.), and Artaxerxes II (404-359 B.C.).

Some examples are given below.

Middle-Babylonian Transcriptions (ilu) A-ma-a-na, (ilu) A-ma-na: the god Amun, B amoun; (m) A-ma-an- a-at-pi, n. pr. m. Amenophis, where the group a-at-pi corresponds to the qualitative B hotp†; (al ) A-na: n. bc. Heliopolis, Egyptian ’Iwnw, Hebrew ’On: B wn; (m) Ri-a-na-pa: n. pr. m. Ranofer, literally “the good Sun” or similar, where according to Edel the name was pronounced R ‘n fe or similar, but in any case with Ra’ and not with R ‘, sun = S, B r/; (ilu) a-a-ra: the god Horus, S, B hwr.

Assyrian Transcriptions (m) U-na-mu-nu: n. pr. m. Wen-Amun or similar, which contains the name of Amun, B amoun; (m) Bu-kur-ni-ni-ip: n. pr. m. Bocchoris, Egyptian B3k n rn-f’ literally “servant of his name,” where the Coptic form would be B *bwk nrinf (the transcription should read *(m) Bu-ku-un-ri-ni-ip); (m) u-u-ru: n. pr. m. Horus, S, B hwr; ( lu) Me-im-pe: n. loc. Memphis, B menfi.

New-Babylonian and Persian Period (m) A-mu-nu-ta-pu-na-a -ti: n. pr. m. Amon tef-na te, literally “Amon is his strength,” with Amunu =*Am n or Am n, B amoun; (m) Na-’a- (ilu) E-si n. pr. m. literally “Great is Isis,” where the Coptic form would be B *naa-/ci Commentary Middle-Babylonian corresponds to later (i.e., Assyrian or Neo-Assyrian or Persian) (see Table 1). This comparison shows that long before 1000 B.C. is transcribed as long after 1000 B.C. This long must be read , as the Coptic has in two cases ( n and H r). After a nasal in A-mu-nu and in nu-u-pi (reconstructed), the Coptic has ou , which is due to postnasalization. As a matter of fact, it is not known if A-mu-nu and nu-u-pi were still pronounced *Am n and *n fi or already Am n and n fi.

table 1

Middle-Babylonian Assyrian or Coptic Neo-Assyrian and Persian A-ma-a-na (*Am n) A-mu-nu (Am n) B amoun A-na (* n) U-nu ( n) B wn Ka-si (*K s) Ku-u-si (K ) __ a-a-ra (* r u-u-ru ( r) S, B hwr -na-pa (*n fe) *-nu-u-pi (*n fi) B noufi

Articles that link here (1)
Bibliography

Beckerath, J. von. Abriss der Geschichte des alten Ägypten. Munich and Vienna, 1971. Edel, E. “Neue keilschriftliche Umschreibungen ägyptischer Namen aus den Bogazköytexten.” Journal of Near Eastern Studies 7 (1948):11—24. ______. Die Ortsnamenlisten aus dem Totentempel Amenophis III. Bonner biblische Beiträge 25. Bonn, 1966. ______. “Der Brief des ägyptischen Wesirs Pa ij ra an den Hetiterkönig attusili und verwandte Keilschriftbriefe.” Nachrichten der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen, Philosophisch-historische Klasse 1, no. 4 (1978):117-58. ______. “Neue Deutungen keilschriftlicher Umschreibungen ägyptischer Wörter und Personennamen.” In Sitzungsberichte der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-historische Klasse, Sitzungsberichte, p. 175. Vienna, 1980. Lambdin, T. O. “Another Cuneiform Transcription of Egyptian ms ‘crocodile.’” Journal of Near Eastern Studies 12 (1953a):284-85. ______. “Egyptian Words in Tell el Amarna Letter No. 14.” Orientalia 22 (1953b):362-69. Ranke, H. “Keilschriftliches Material zur ägyptischen Vokalisation.” In Anhang zu den Abhandlungen der Königlichen Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-historische Klasse, Abhandlung 2. Berlin, 1910. Smith, S., and C. J. Gadd. “A Cuneiform Vocabulary of Egyptian Words.” Journal of Egyptian Archaeology 11 (1925):230-38. Vittmann, G. “Zu einigen keilschriftlichen Umschreibungen ägyptischer Personennamen.” Göttinger Miszellen 70 (1984):65-66. WERNER VYCICHL